More and more, I feel like I am living in the 2004 version of JFK, where we are using the same arguments to prove a conspiracy that is so obvious, people think it can't exist. I read an article today that was written September 6, 2003. In detail, it is written that not only plans to invade and occupy Iraq existed, but Afghanistan as well... with links going all the way to Cheney's secret energy task force.

Everything from a power plant of Enron's, in India, was in dire need of getting their hands on cheaper gas, our dependence on foreign oil will dramatically increase by the year 2010, we were planning military action against Afghanistan in mid-July 2001!, etc.

This article caused outrage in Britain when it was written, and rightfully so. It is looking like Mr. Blair was riding the coattails of a moron who led the "free-world" into a war that was faked from years before day 1.

... We now know that a blueprint for the creation of a global Pax Americana was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice-president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), Jeb Bush (George Bush's younger brother) and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defences, was written in September 2000 by the neoconservative think tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

The plan shows Bush's cabinet intended to take military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says "while the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."

...A report from the commission on America's national interests in July 2000 noted that the most promising new source of world supplies was the Caspian region, and this would relieve US dependence on Saudi Arabia. To diversify supply routes from the Caspian, one pipeline would run westward via Azerbaijan and Georgia to the Turkish port of Ceyhan. Another would extend eastwards through Afghanistan and Pakistan and terminate near the Indian border. This would rescue Enron's beleaguered power plant at Dabhol on India's west coast, in which Enron had sunk $3bn investment and whose economic survival was dependent on access to cheap gas...

...Similarly the PNAC blueprint of September 2000 states that the process of transforming the US into "tomorrow's dominant force" is likely to be a long one in the absence of "some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor". The 9/11 attacks allowed the US to press the "go" button for a strategy in accordance with the PNAC agenda which it would otherwise have been politically impossible to implement.

If you don't know why we were attacked, you aren't thinking big enough. "You're not asking the right questions bubba."

A lot of my friends have heard me say that I believe the US could have had something to do with 9/11 ... not the kind of thing you can say very loud when you work in the city that was most affected ... or when some of your friends were actually in the second tower ... but the more stuff that comes out, the more I believe it and the more I hate certain people. This administration is crooked from top to bottom, and the bottom doesn't always tell the top or the middle about what's going on. People are playing each other, and ultimately our lives, our livelihood and our future's are at risk.
If Bush is reelected prepare yourself for a terrible fate. If he is not... prepare yourself for another Bush in 2008, and another war. It is no longer irony with these fascists.